0
0
The court in Mumbai has guaranteed actor Kamaal R Khan, known as KRK, in the case of harassment 2021 registered with him by the Suburban Versova Police.
Khan, however, will remain in prison, because the request for guarantees is delayed before the Borivali court in the 2020 controversial tweet case about actor Akshay Kumar and the filmmaker Ram Gopal Verma. The request for guarantees in the tweet case is likely to be heard by the Borivali Metropolitan Judge Court on Wednesday (7 September).
Khan was arrested from Mumbai International Airport on August 30 for alleged demean tweets and sent to court custody by the Borivali Judge Court. The Versova police on Sunday took his custody in the harassment case and he was produced before the Bandra Court.
Khan, in the request for guarantees submitted through lawyers Ashok Sarogi and Jay Yadav before the Magistrate Bandra Court, claimed the content of the first information report (FIR) was not in accordance with the alleged incidents of practical harassment.
Advocate Yadav proposed before the court that Fir was registered 18 months after the incident and that was also after the victim’s friend asked him to do it.
He further argues that the Indian Criminal Code section called to Khan is available. The court allows Khan’s request. Detailed orders are not yet available
The case of harassment was registered in June 2021 based on the complaint of a 27 -year -old woman under section 354 (a) (sexual harassment of the nature of disliked physical contact) and 509 (words or movements that intend to insult the simplicity of any person) and 509 women ) From IPC.
The complainant accused that Khan had called him to his bungalow in Versova on the pretext of offering him a major role in a film. He jumped his drink and touched it incorrectly, according to fir.
According to the police, the tweet posted by Khan in 2020 was communal and he targeted Bollywood’s personality. He was ordered in 2020 under section 153 (only with Nanteng provoked with the intention to cause riots) and 500 (punishment for defamation) and other provisions from IPC and Information Technology
